My commentary is on the blog post “Blog
#5 Texas State and Local Government”.
This blog’s driving point seems to be a concern that protesters fail to
engage their critical thinking skills before engaging in protests at the
capital and that they are just being riled up by media coverage. The author does not provide their name, but
from their profile information I find that they consider themselves a staunch
conservative and are studying Agriculture at Texas A&M.
I found his commentary level headed and reasonable, with
little to no inflammatory language. He
seems to have a genuine concern for his topic, and quite frankly I agree with
almost all of his post. I would say his
target audience is probably conservatives, but I can see almost anybody from any
stance agreeing with him. The only blatant
political leaning was in the example he used where he specifically targeted people
opposing the bill. From what I can
remember, there were protesters from both sides of the debate that were there
protesting, and to single one out as being more ignorant of the topic than the
other is shortsighted.
One of the underlying tones of the post that I found a tad naive
is the thought that these kinds of protests are something new. I would argue that if you take the time to
look back on history you’ll see that this is anything but out of the ordinary
and that our lack of protests in recent years is actually what is out of the
ordinary and in fact more worrying. I
was personally ecstatic that people finally felt impassioned enough to get off
their couches and go make them selves heard.
I wish more people would get this involved on topics other than the few
that the media decides to cover. Even if
they are not that knowledgeable to begin with, the act of being involved will
often times produce self education.
No comments:
Post a Comment